Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €78.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT?
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
