Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
