Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
62.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
