Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
