Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 8000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa BG
Spinning
68.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight850g / 29.98oz
Line retireve per crank135 centimeter / 53.15 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/500
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 8000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a weight of 545g / 19,22oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa BG?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa BG 8000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
