Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX
