Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
