Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
