Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.06/200
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa RX LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa RX LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X
