Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
46.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa Regal LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX
