Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
