Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight254g / 8.96oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €16.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/310
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Delphin BRONZ 5000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Delphin BRONZ 5000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin BRONZ?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin BRONZ 5000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
