Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin INKS 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Delphin INKS 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Delphin INKS 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin INKS?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin INKS 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
