Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R
