Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight310g / 10.93oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 5000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Delphin IXTREK 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin IXTREK?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin IXTREK 5000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
