Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight310g / 10.93oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 5000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Delphin IXTREK 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin IXTREK?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin IXTREK 5000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX
