Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin REDIX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin REDIX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Delphin REDIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin REDIX?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin REDIX
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
