Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin REDIX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin REDIX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Delphin REDIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin REDIX?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin REDIX
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
