Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Delphin SHARX 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Delphin SHARX 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin SHARX?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H
