Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Delphin SHARX 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Delphin SHARX 4000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin SHARX?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
