Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a ball bearings of 7, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4 kg), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
