Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Battle III 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Penn Battle III
Spinning
72.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.73 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 3000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 545g / 19,22oz and a ergonomics of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
