Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 6000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.6:1) and the durability (7.81 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 545g / 19,22oz and a ergonomics of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (11,3kg / 24,91lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
