Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
65.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 3000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 545g / 19,22oz and a ergonomics of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
