Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and gear ratio (4.7). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Beastmaster
