Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Catana FE?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
