Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.0:1) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Complex XR?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Beastmaster
