Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Complex XR?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
