Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano FX
Spinning
46.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Shimano FX 1000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Shimano FX 1000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano FX?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano FX 1000 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
