Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX
