Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
