Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
