Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
