Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X
