Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
