Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
