Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
