Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX and Shimano Sedona 500 FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona 500 FI stands out for a gear ratio of 5.6:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
