Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank61 centimeter / 24.02 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €24.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/140
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
