Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
64.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €66.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX
