Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (4.7:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
