Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
