Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
