Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X
