Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
