Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
