Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
