Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
