Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT
Spinning
65.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.06oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €78.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT?
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
