Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX
