Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
84.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
