Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
