Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
