Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
62.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Battle III 2000X
